• Home
  • About
  • Articles
    • National Review
    • Washington Examiner
    • The Hill Newspaper
    • The College Fix
    • Academic Papers
  • Media Appearances
  • Ascendyn Advertising
  • Contact
    • Home
    • About
    • Articles
      • National Review
      • Washington Examiner
      • The Hill Newspaper
      • The College Fix
      • Academic Papers
    • Media Appearances
    • Ascendyn Advertising
    • Contact
    Independent Candidate Evan McMullin Opens Up to NR
    August 8, 2016

    ‘Donald Trump is losing because he is a weak candidate. Trump is weak. And I frankly question whether he has the stamina to make it through the election,” newly declared independent presidential candidate Evan McMullin told National Review this morning during the first on-the-record interview of his campaign.

    “I see him imploding.”

    McMullin, who announced his candidacy this morning, explained that the state of the presidential election has rendered him “distraught for the last several months.” And so, after months of waiting for other candidates to jump in and challenge Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, McMullin did it himself.

    “I believe Donald Trump is a bona fide authoritarian,” McMullin said. “I am deeply concerned that if he were president of the United States he would act accordingly.”

    McMullin is a devout Mormon who was born in Utah and raised in western Washington. While attending Brigham Young University, he began a ten-year career with the CIA. Along the way, he also earned an MBA from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and worked in the investment-banking division at Goldman Sachs. Until this morning, he was the chief policy director for the House Republican Conference.

    Unsurprisingly given his previous work, McMullin seemed especially interested in foreign policy, and was keen to draw a contrast between himself and the other announced candidates.

    Read More at National Review

    Read More
    No Comment

    National Review

    “The Humanities in the Eyes of Texas and Florida Politicians” (2016)
    July 11, 2016

    The Humanities in the Eyes of Texas and Florida Politicians

    Abstract: This is an extension to the March 2016 4Humanities study “What U.S. Politicians Say About the Humanities: White Paper on the Humanities in Political Discourse, 2009-2015,” which examined United States political discourse during 2009 to 2015 in the legislative and executive branches of the federal government and also the legislative branch of one state (California) to discover how politicians talk about the humanities. By now analyzing records from state legislatures in the second and third most populated states behind California (Texas and Florida), 4Humanities concludes that the humanities do not always figure in U.S. political discourse in a drama of “recognition.” Both Texas and Florida state legislators frequently drafted bills referencing the humanities during 2009 to 2015 that created substantive change. This is different than in California, where state legislators in the same years overwhelmingly recognized the humanities just through resolutions.

    This study was published on 4humanities.org.

    Read the Full Study

    Read More
    No Comment

    Academic Papers

    Honors Thesis: A Powerful Advocate for the President
    June 10, 2016

    A Powerful Advocate for the President: The Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel

    Political Science Departmental Honors Thesis: “To what extent has the politicization of the presidency affected the operations of the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel?”​ (June 2015 – June 2016)

    Abstract: This study examines legal opinions and corresponding documents from the United States Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) between 1981 and 2013 to discover the extent to which the office’s operations have been affected by the politicization of the presidency. Political science research has focused little attention on this influential office in the context of presidential politicization and centralization. After analyzing archives from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, as well as records from the OLC, The Washington Post, The New York Times, and the Congressional Record, it became evident that the OLC may be shifting toward presidential advocacy rather than neutrality. If the OLC is an advocate for the president, multiple politicization indicators would be validated: (1) an increase over time in the number of politically appointed Deputy Assistant Attorneys General; (2) an increase in OLC opinions at the end of an administration’s tenure; (3) the negative treatment rate (opinions that overrule and/or modify prior legal interpretations) would increase over time; (4) pro-president language such as “executive power,” “executive privilege,” and “unilateral” would be routine across published opinions, and the OLC would rarely limit White House requests; (5) controversial legal opinions discussed in the media would oftentimes not be published on the OLC website; (6) Congress would greatly scrutinize the OLC when the government is divided; (7) the content of the opinions chosen for publication would be a function of the partisan orientation of the president. The study validated six of the seven politicization indicators, leading to the conclusion that the politicization of the presidency has affected OLC’s operations.

    Read the Full Study

    Read More
    No Comment

    Academic Papers

    Milo makes UCSB great again: Visit includes kingly entrance, Trump, and ‘America, F*ck Yeah!’
    May 27, 2016

    Say one thing for Milo Yiannopoulos, say he knows how to make an entrance.

    The firebrand Breitbartjournalist’s highly anticipated visit to the University of California at Santa Barbara on Thursday as part of the “Dangerous Faggot Tour” began with the pundit entering on a large wooden chair held aloft by a group of male students with bright red “Make America Great Again” hats on as the song “America, F*ck Yeah” played in the background.

    Yiannopoulos gave a little fist pump at the song’s chorus, then the crowd erupted in chants of “USA, USA!”

    In fact, Yiannopoulos – with a full-size Donald Trump cardboard cutout in tow – received a mostly warm welcome at the campus that earlier in the week saw protests between event organizers and student activists.

    The speech took place without being shut down by rabid student protesters, unlike some of his other campus visits, most notably at DePaul University earlier this week where students stormed the stage.

    At UCSB, many students in the room donned Trump shirts and signs. Besides a handful of shouting matches here and there during the speech, no protests inside the venue materialized.

    Some 200 students packed the lecture hall to hear Yiannopoulos wax philosophic on topics related to “Feminism is Cancer,” the official title of his speech. No sacred cow was left unscathed as he mocked modern feminist icons Lena Dunham and Amy Schumer, and joked that if women worked longer hours maybe the wage gap would shrink.

    He commented that feminists tote “red and purple and green hair,” and feminist studies departments want to turn students into “Lena Dunham-lookalikes.”

    “I’m convinced Lena Dunham is a conspiracy. Is there anyone who actually likes Lena Dunham? So why is she on the cover of everything, like Amy f***** Schumer?” he said.

    He also focused on rape statistics. For example, he said that in 2014, there were only 12 rapes on UCSB’s campus of roughly 20,000 students, which differs from the rape statistics showing one in four college women are raped across the country.

    He went on to ask whether feminists would want “men to rape more so they’ve got more to complain about so they can hang onto their ridiculous fallacious statistics or whether they prefer to rediscover their commitment to truth, accuracy, and evidence-based thinking. I don’t know, perhaps a feminist would like to tell me.”

    Read More at The College Fix

    Read More
    No Comment

    The College Fix

    “What U.S. Politicians Say About the Humanities” (2016)
    March 1, 2016

    What U.S. Politicians Say About the Humanities: White Paper on the Humanities in Political Discourse, 2009-2015

    Abstract: This study examines United States political discourse during 2009 to 2015 in the legislative and executive branches of the federal government and also the legislative branch of one state (California) to discover how politicians talk about the humanities. After analyzing records from the White House, Congress, and the California State Legislature, 4Humanities concludes that while the Obama administration has tried to promote the humanities using limited means (such as encouraging public-private partnerships and youth programs), neither the federal nor state legislatures studied, whatever the good will of particular politicians or parties, has moved for substantive improvement in the humanities. Legislators primarily mention the humanities in simple resolutions, thus conferring recognition without altering the status quo. The humanities figure in U.S. political discourse mainly in a drama of “recognition.”

    This study was published on 4humanities.org.

    Read the Full Study

    Read More
    No Comment

    Academic Papers

    In win for intellectual diversity, CU Boulder’s Conservative Thought and Policy Program extended
    February 29, 2016

    University of Colorado at Boulder is nestled in a region nicknamed the “People’s Republic of Boulder” and known for staunchly supporting left-leaning policies and causes – yet a three-year Conservative Thought and Policy Program launched at the school has been so successful it’s been extended for at least another year, with leaders saying they hope to make it a permanent fixture on campus.

    “We had always hoped to be able to extend the program indefinitely, and it has been such a success that it was an easy decision to keep it going,” advisory committee chairman Dr. Robert Pasnau said in an interview with The College Fix.

    Classes the Visiting Scholars’ have taught have been popular with students, and guest lectures the scholars have hosted added rigorous debate within the campus community, so much so that even left-leaning professors have enjoyed hosting the program, those involved with it told The College Fix in interviews.

    “We hope to expand the program going forward, by bringing in a larger roster of visiting scholars, reflecting a wider range of viewpoints from conservative to liberal,” said Pasnau, who is also a philosophy professor at the school.

    The three-year pilot program began in 2013, and it continues to be supported by private funds. A Visiting Scholar is appointed to a one-year teaching post.

    The program seeks to appoint “highly visible scholars who are deeply engaged in either the analytical scholarship or practice of conservative thinking and policymaking or both.”

    Dr. Francis Beckwith, the fourth Visiting Scholar, is a professor of philosophy and church-state studies at Baylor University. He is scheduled to teach philosophy classes this fall on the topics of Thomas Aquinas and “Philosophy and Society,” the department stated.

    Read More at The College Fix

    Read More
    No Comment

    The College Fix

    VIDEO: ‘F*ck your borders’ – Rowdy students protest border patrol agents at campus job fair
    January 28, 2016

    SANTA BARBARA – A cadre of University of California-Santa Barbara students took to the quad Thursday to protest the participation of U.S. Customs and Border Protection recruiters at a campus job fair, loudly chanting “f*ck your borders, f*ck your walls” among other slogans.

    The 50 or so student protestors who lined the outside of the campus building hosting the career fair held aloft a large banner stating “Undocumented Unafraid,” and also chanted “Hey hey, ho ho – CBP has got to go.”

    “We do have undocumented students here on campus who are at potential risk,” said UCSB graduate student Idalia Robles in an interview with The College Fix. “This is a very triggering event for people in those circumstances. There is no space on this campus for an organization that continues to threaten the safety of students.”

    A video taken by a College Fix reporter shows students continuing to chant similar slogans – sometimes in English and other times in Spanish – as the demonstration continued into the afternoon.

    Several students declined to be interviewed by The College Fix, but the group appeared to include a mix of members from several student organizations on campus. Robles said demonstrators had mostly converged to show solidarity with undocumented students.

    “This event is a university endorsed event, right? And there is the presence of Customs and Border Patrol. We are in a Hispanic serving institution. One of the concerns that are very present in the Chicano-Latino-Mexicana community is that of immigration and the abuse of power at the hands of immigration officers,” she said. “[A]s someone committed to social justice, I know that this is something crucial.”

    Students at the public university were notified Monday via email about career fair participants, along with a statement by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

    Read More at The College Fix

    Read More
    No Comment

    The College Fix

    Online master’s degree becomes more widely accepted – but still faces hurdles
    August 18, 2015

    Earning a master’s degree from a for-profit online university may be a viable option, but many say it’s not necessarily worth the bang for your buck.

    With the proliferation of people with online master’s degrees, employers and job recruiters have found that some online degrees are preferred among others.

    “Traditional universities that offer online degrees are usually better than for-profit online universities,” said the vice president of a top recruiting firm in the Washington, D.C. area. “Going the traditional route is always best.”

    The trick is that many traditional universities offer online degrees, but do not create a distinction on the diploma between an online degree and a traditional degree.

    When asked if an online MBA from American University says “online,” Assistant Dean of Digital Initiatives and New Programs Jill Klein stated: “You get a master’s degree that says American University, and it’s the degree.”

    Nowadays, many employers have raised the standards of employment, requiring employees to have advanced degrees.

    “One of the things that I’ve seen since the recession, and it’s probably because there are a lot of job seekers, is that employers have added ‘master’s degree helpful’ or ‘master’s degree required,’” said the owner of a leading political staffing company in Washington, D.C.

    He explained that through the eyes of employers, a candidate with a master’s degree is assumed to have better critical thinking and writing skills.

    Unfortunately, many undergraduates skate through college without learning necessary skills to be successful in the workplace, the political staffer added.

    For-profit online universities give job candidates a degree to get their foot in the door, many job recruiters say, but there isn’t any guarantee the degree is worth the investment.

    “It enhances the pool of people who may not otherwise be looked at, but I don’t know if it puts them in the same tier as those from a traditional four year school,” said the vice president of the job-recruiting firm.

    However, online degrees from for-profit universities may be valuable when complementing work experience on a résumé.

    According to Joe Sinclair, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Talent Acquisitions Manager at Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP, “many working professionals have proven their ability to manage time and collaborate effectively, so an online program in their field of study might suit them very well.”

    For-profit online universities are oftentimes the only option to further one’s knowledge in academia, and job recruiters said it is a reasonable route.

    “People should be very aware of the organizations they are picking, and whether it will help a résumé,” emphasized the vice president of the job-recruiting firm.

    Last May, The New York Times reported on an incident in which a fraudulent Pakistani online university, Axact, made millions without any accreditations.

    Through Internet connections, Axact targeted those who sought to earn an advanced degree, took their money, and rewarded them with a worthless diploma.

    In order to confirm whether an online degree is worth the bang for the buck and not a scam, Sinclair suggested that people should contact alumni via social media or other mediums to confirm that the degree will be beneficial with “collaboration, professional attention, and time management.”

    Read More at The College Fix

    Read More
    No Comment

    The College Fix

    Trump grows bullish on 2016 chances
    August 17, 2015

    GOP front-runner Donald Trump is showing more confidence about his chances of winning the party’s nomination and the presidency in 2016.

    In an exclusive interview with The Hill last month, Trump refused to predict that he’d be the Republican nominee, calling such talk “presumptuous.”

    “I’m surprised that I’m this high,” he told The Hill about his poll numbers. A day after interview, Trump even shared concerns that “maybe people will get tired of me.”

    Since then, Trump’s been talking up his chances, buoyed by his high standing in the polls. Even the controversy over his feud with Fox News debate moderator Megyn Kelly failed to drag him down.

    Trump is now saying that not only will he win the nomination, but that Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton is poised to collapse.

    “I think [Clinton] may not be able to run, to be honest, because this whole email thing is a horrible thing,” Trump said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

    And when grilled by Chuck Todd on his policy positions, Trump responded, “In four years you’re going to be interviewing me and you’re going to say, ‘What a great job you’ve done, President Trump.'”

    Here’s a look at how Donald Trump has grown more bullish on the campaign trail:

    April 18: “I think I can beat her and not a lot of other people could,” Trump said of Hillary Clinton, two months before entering the race. “If I get into a primary, I am going to fight like you wouldn’t believe,” he added.

    June 17: “I would say anywhere from 10 to 20 percent. Ten to 20,” Trump said when asked about his chances of winning the race. “One thing I can tell you, I will be trying.”

    June 28: Trump insisted he was serious about his race, telling CNN’s “State of the Union,” “I’m in it to win it.”

    July 15: Trump called the upcoming race a “challenge.” “I look forward to the challenge of winning the presidency and doing a fantastic job for our country,” Trump said after filing his financial paperwork.

    July 22: In an interview with The Hill, Trump declined to follow former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), who predicted victory in the 2012 race by saying, “I’m going to be the nominee.” Trump said he wouldn’t be “presumptuous.”

    “I’m surprised that I’m this high,” he said of his poll numbers.

    July 23: “I wanna run as a Republican. I think I’ll get the nomination,” Trump said during his trip to the U.S.-Mexico border. “She’s [Clinton] going to be beat, and I’m the one who’s going to beat her.”

    July 24: On MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Trump faced questions about whether the interest in his candidacy would last. “I’m just chugging along,” Trump said. “You know, maybe people will get tired of me. Who knows? I mean, this press is crazy. … I don’t know, maybe people get burned out.”

    Read More at The Hill Newspaper

    Read More
    No Comment

    The Hill Newspaper

    Trump towers over field in social media
    August 17, 2015

    GOP front-runner Donald Trump is dominating his rivals on social media, with the most followers on two of the top three platforms.

    The controversial businessman, who’s vaulted to the top of the GOP polls, has more than 3 million likes on Facebook — nearly 1 million over the nearest Republican, Dr. Ben Carson, on the most popular social network.

    That’s also well ahead of the nearest Democrats. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has just over 1 million likes, and Hillary Clinton has more than 1.1 million.

    The Hill tallied the followers for each presidential campaign on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to see who has the edge on social media as of Aug. 11. Where candidates had more than one account, we relied on the primary campaign social media accounts.

    On Twitter, Clinton and Trump rank far ahead of the pack. Clinton tops the field with 4.02 million followers, with Trump in second at 3.67 million. But Trump is a much more avid Twitter user, with 27,400 tweets compared to Clinton’s 1,304.

    Their totals are well above those of Sens. Marco Rubio (Fla.), with 811,000, and Rand Paul (Ky.), with 667,000 followers. Sanders stands with 316,000 followers.

    But that second GOP tier is more active on Twitter than Clinton, with Rubio tweeting 3,048 times, Paul 5,564 times and Sanders 2,823 times.

    On photo-sharing network Instagram as well, Trump’s 293,000 followers and Clinton’s 217,000 lead the pack. Republican Govs. Scott Walker (Wis.) at 431 photos and Chris Christie (N.J.) at 393 are the most active, though.

    Social media is playing a prominent role in the 2016 campaign, with candidates using it to directly reach out to voters and share their message. Trump has used Twitter to hammer away at his critics and Clinton has used it to weigh in on top issues.

    And social media provides a snapshot of the race, with other candidates surging following last week’s first GOP debate.

    Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, sparked interest with his jokes about not getting enough attention on the debate stage.

    According to the Facebook-tracker Crowdtangle, Carson has a total of 3,270,574 social media interactions, topping Trump and Sanders for the week at 2,023,562 and 1,889,876, respectively.

    Read More at The Hill Newspaper

    Read More
    No Comment

    The Hill Newspaper

    Newer Posts Older Posts

    • Media Inquiries

      • austin@ascendyn.com
      • 760-537-3457
    • Follow Me

      • Twitter
      • Facebook


      © Copyright Austin R. Yack 2021

      Cleantalk Pixel