• Home
  • About
  • Articles
    • National Review
    • Washington Examiner
    • The Hill Newspaper
    • The College Fix
    • Academic Papers
  • Media Appearances
  • Ascendyn Advertising
  • Contact
    • Home
    • About
    • Articles
      • National Review
      • Washington Examiner
      • The Hill Newspaper
      • The College Fix
      • Academic Papers
    • Media Appearances
    • Ascendyn Advertising
    • Contact

    Feinstein: Roe v. Wade Is ‘Super Precedent’

    March 20, 2017

    Senator Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, used her ten-minute introduction during Judge Neil Gorsuch’s Supreme Court nomination hearing this morning to peddle the notion that Roe v. Wade — the 1973 landmark Supreme Court case legalizing abortion — is “super precedent.” This theory, that some court rulings cannot be reversed, has never been accepted by any U.S. court.

    After submitting to the Senate’s record 14 Supreme Court cases and 39 other court decisions, all of which upheld Roe, Feinstein said, “If these judgments, when combined, do not constitute super precedent, I don’t know what does.”

    No matter how much the Left loves the Supreme Court decision in Roe, neither that case nor any other constitutes “super precedent,” because super precedent does not exist.

    Read More at National Review

    Share

    National Review




      © Copyright Austin R. Yack 2021

      Cleantalk Pixel